The linked article was an enlightening read. The author saying “This scripture cannot be interpreted any other way..” 16 And the Pharisees and Sad′ducees came, and to test him they asked him to show them a sign from heaven. Even the Greek Fathers, to whom the language was natural, had varying interpretations, and certainly the meaning has more than one layer. The Middle Ages saw pope after pope trying to rewrite history to make the Catholic Church into something it was not. This is what is called a demonstrative pronoun, and it’s used for pointing at things — and it can point at people just as well as anything else. Yes, there is no doubt that Jesus is the cornerstone on which the Church is built, and the Church has never argued otherwise. Once again, Matthew did not invent the name Πέτρος for Peter — so whatever linguistic distinction there might be between Πέτρος and πέτρα is owed to whoever first coined the name Πέτρος and not to Matthew. “For you are small stones but upon this rock I will build my church”. The burgeoning medieval bureaucracy kind of necessitated a monarchical hierarchy, I think. I merely cited Mark as the earliest documented use of the name. It could refer to an idea but not a person. 6 As the Scriptures say. For the record, I’m an evangelical to Catholic convert, Suleyman (Tyson) is an evangelical to Antiochian Orthodox convert, and Jessica is Anglo-Catholic with affinities for both Catholicism and Orthodoxy. If you accept the interpretation of Matthew 16:17-19 that I’ve supported here, what does that entail for you? John Nolland, The Gospel of Matthew, The New International Greek Testament Commentary [Eerdmans, 2005], 669; Charles L. Quarles, Matthew, Exegetical Guide to the Greek New Testament [B&H, 2017], 320). And there doesn’t seem to be any other rock, any petra present. Oh btw? (*poke* also to Jessica’s comment below, which I’m not sure will have been e-mailed to you), Pingback: The Same Gospel: A Plea to Protestants « The Lonely Pilgrim, Pingback: Authority « All Along the Watchtower. As for criticizing the Church — you’re right, as a new convert, I don’t really feel it’s my place. There is no reason to think Jesus was singling Peter out. Matthew 16:18 18 And I tell you , i you are Peter , and j on this rock 2 I will build my church , and k the gates of l hell 3 shall not prevail against it . Although we don’t change, in the eight years since I converted I have learned that there is quite a diversity in practice and even some in theology in my church. (“Here” being this post. This is not assuming anything about Peter, but about the Church. In any case, up until the Eastern Schism, most in the East accepted Rome as the See of Peter. “This man” doesn’t refer to a person (Matthew 12:24, Mark 15:39, Luke 23:4, John 7:46)? This is confirmed by several commentaries on the Gospel of Matthew (cf. Given this, other interpretations of the Biblical text are possible. Matthew 16:18: And I tell you that you are Peter,The Greek word for "Peter" means "rock. So there can be no question that Jesus is speaking to Peter and to Peter alone here; not to all the Apostles; not to all Christians. And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I was just thinking of you in my response to the comment above, and you replied while I was typing it. Now, I fully understand that this is speculative; however, my point is that it’s speculative on both our parts. You are assuming an English grammatical mindset. I’m open to arguments, but I just don’t see it. I apologize for the delay in my response. What “ample evidence” is there that Jesus would have taught in Greek, or that he even knew Greek? The point of departure for most people is the Second Vatican Council (1965–1968), a.k.a. It was, in Greek, the name by which Peter was most commonly known. 16:18 – ; (ἐπὶ ταύτῃ τῇ πέτρᾳ [upon this fixed stone]) And I say also unto thee Either besides what he had already said concerning his happiness; or, as the father had revealed something great and valuable, so likewise would he; or inasmuch as he had freely said and declared who, and what he was, in like manner he also would say what Peter was, thou art Peter: intimating, that he was rightly called Peter, or Cephas, by him, when … Matthew 16:18 18 And I tell you that you are Peter , b e and on this rock I will build my church , f and the gates of Hades c will not overcome it . 2. a rock, i.e. What can be made of these facts? Jesus was singling Peter out. I think it my duty to consult the chair of Peter, and to turn to a Church whose faith has been praised by Paul . She might be correct in all she does and I might be wrong everywhere I disagree (I doubt this, but it is possible). Answer: The debate rages over whether “the rock” on which Christ will build His church is Peter, or Peter’s confession that Jesus is “the Christ, the Son of the Living God” (Matthew 16:16). It contains no implication at all of sacredness or holiness.. But not Peter himself. Also the Coptic Orthodox Church, unlike some of the other Oriental Orthodox Churches, with which it shares communion, officially requires that all converts be rebaptised. Moreover, πέτρα is used specifically for “foundation” in the NT, and, as you note, juxtaposed with λίθος in many contexts. From the New Testament onward, in patristic and Byzantine Koine, I can only find references to Πέτρος, a proper noun, referring to the Apostle Peter. Cephas is a Syriac word, meaning the same as Peter - a rock, or stone. Thank you — no, don’t apologize. Christ, you see, built his Church not on a man but on Peter’s confession. Matthew 16:18. A Comprehensive Response, Early Testimonies to St. Peter’s Ministry in Rome, http://www.orthodoxresearchinstitute.org/articles/ecumenical/maxwell_peter.htm, Saints Peter and Paul: Apostles to the Protestants? I also read statements from other scholars that by the New Testament, there was not much of a distinction between πέτρος and πέτρα and that the words were used interchangeably (cf. If you have more evidence, I’ll be glad to discuss it. Sure, it’s a possibility. Matthew 16:18: And I tell you that you are Peter,The Greek word for "Peter" means "rock. Pingback: Saints Peter and Paul: Apostles to the Protestants? and Ep. First, I’d like to say that I like your explanation in the last paragraph above for a possible reason for the use of Πέτρος as a move from the first-declension feminine to the second-declension masculine in order to accommodate the new name for Simon. For a long time I felt that as a convert I should not wish any change for my church, that I could disagree but since I chose her I should keep my thoughts to myself. 17:4 + Matthew 16:18(ESV) Verse Thoughts. Ïίαν καὶ ÏÏλαι á¾ Î´Î¿Ï Î¿á½ ÎºÎ±ÏιÏÏÏÏÎ¿Ï Ïιν αá½Ïá¿Ï, ×××£ ×× × ××ר ×××× ×× ××ª× ×¤×ר×ס ××¢× ×ס××¢ ××× ××× × ×ת ×§×××ª× ××©×¢×¨× ×©××× ×× ××××¨× ×¢××××, Üܦ ÜÜ¢Ü Üܡܪ ÜÜ¢Ü Ü Ü ÜÜܢܬ ÜÜ ÜÜÜ¦Ü ÜÜ¥Ü ÜÜÜ ÜÜÜ¦Ü ÜÜÜ¢ÜÜ Ü Ü¥ÜÜ¬Ü ÜÜ¬ÜªÜ¥Ü ÜÜ«ÜÜÜ Ü Ü Ü¢ÜܤܢÜÜ¢Ü Ü, ÎÎΤΠÎÎΤÎÎÎÎÎ 16:18 Greek NT: Nestle 1904, ÎÎΤΠÎÎΤÎÎÎÎÎ 16:18 Greek NT: Westcott and Hort 1881, ÎÎΤΠÎÎΤÎÎÎÎÎ 16:18 Greek NT: Westcott and Hort / [NA27 and UBS4 variants], ÎÎΤΠÎÎΤÎÎÎÎÎ 16:18 Greek NT: RP Byzantine Majority Text 2005, ÎÎΤΠÎÎΤÎÎÎÎÎ 16:18 Greek NT: Greek Orthodox Church, ÎÎΤΠÎÎΤÎÎÎÎÎ 16:18 Greek NT: Tischendorf 8th Edition, ÎÎΤΠÎÎΤÎÎÎÎÎ 16:18 Greek NT: Scrivener's Textus Receptus 1894, ÎÎΤΠÎÎΤÎÎÎÎÎ 16:18 Greek NT: Stephanus Textus Receptus 1550. But that doesn’t appear to be what you’re doing. I am an Orthodox catechumen, so my answer may not be perfect. 1 Clement) and onward through church history, as first among their brother bishops. I’ve enjoyed researching the replies. The difference is that these authors were consciously emulating or affecting a classical Attic style and vocabulary. Now, I’m not resting solidly on this, because I’ve seen what appears to be inconsistencies within PPs with respect to the presence/absence of the article, and I’ve not fully tested this. Jesus renames Peter “Rock” (as I think we agree) and declares that it is “on this rock” that He will build His Church. Not only are those nouns singular, but Jesus twice, emphatically, refers to Peter with the second person singular pronoun σὺ (su), in both the nominative σὺ and the dative σοι (soi); and He states that Simon is Peter with the second person singular verb form of to be, εἶ (ei). I have been told by a Protestant theologian that the Armenian and Assyrian Orthodox Churches developed a theology that did not require this in a situation where they were reaccepting many people who had been under the influence of Protestant missionaries, but that it occurred at a time when the Coptic Church was isolated from these other churches. All of this, it seems, is an attempt to undermine the traditional interpretation of this text by raising whatever speculative doubt you can. The reformation was not just about salvation by grace. New American Standard Bible "I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it. Matthew 16:18. And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. No; I’m not badgering you. Read more Share Copy 17:24 +. As Joseph said, we don’t change. No. If a Coptic Orthodox Church member marries in another church, the official position is that they can’t take communion anymore. If we assume an emphatic “You are Peter” and if we assume that Jesus meant that Peter was the petra in the PP, then why didn’t this anarthrous use carry over into the PP? The wealth of imagery in Matthew 16:18 makes it difficult to decide each detail, but the main point is clear. This passage is more subtle. Tellingly, no Greek-speaker raised such an argument as this at any time in the first millennium of the Church; it’s only been raised by English-speakers in the last two centuries. Oil on canvas. a calling out, a meeting, an assembly — but concretely and universally in Christian lit. The 1 way I can’t see it being interpreted unless you have ulterior motives is yo say Jesus was calling Peter the rock he would build his church on. As Father Joe says, here among so many evangelicals, we have to stand for a real and authentic Catholicism. I’ve shown in several ways why it’s unlikely that Peter’s name being Πέτρος was meant to equate him with a Homeric πέτρος, in contrast to the πέτρα with which he’s juxtaposed here: that word πέτρος was an archaic word no longer in common use; Πέτρος is a standard masculinization of the feminine πέτρα. In Matthew 16:18, the word Jesus used for "church" is ekklesia (Strong's #1577), and it is so translated in the King James Version 115 times. At Matthew 16:17-18 (NASB) we read a conversation between Peter and Jesus. The liturgies are in English only and sometimes are a bit shorter. In order to suggest to you that in Peter the Church is to be recognized. And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. Of all the instances in which the New Testament refers to a “rock” or “stone,” in about forty-eight cases λίθος is used, fifteen are πέτρα, and two are ψῆφος (a voting-pebble, as in Revelation 2:17). Peter does have authority, but a sacramental authority shared in common by all bishops, not a prerogative to overrule others or to set himself and his successors up as universal bishops. Hence, Orthodoxy’s reputation for being conservative and its zealous attachment to Tradition. Read more Share Copy Scripture tells us that Jesus renamed Simon Kepha (Κηφᾶς). The language doesn’t say that. Matthew 16 is the sixteenth chapter in the Gospel of Matthew in the New Testament section of the Christian Bible.Jesus starts his final journey to Jerusalem ministering through Judea.The narrative can be divided into the following subsections: No sign except the Sign of Jonah (16:1-4); Beware of yeast (16:5–12); Peter's confession (16:13–20); Predicting His Death and Resurrection (16:21-26) Is it possible that this is because the referent is the same within the same sentence? c. 1611. In Christian literature, Πέτρος became the standard name for Peter, as “Peter” continues to be in translation. All rights reserved. 17 "And Jesus said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon [a]Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. 16:18 says, "κἀγὼ δέ σοι λέγω ὅτι σὺ εἶ Πέτρος καὶ ἐπὶ ταύτῃ τῇ πέτρᾳ οἰκοδομήσω μου τὴν ἐκκλησίαν καὶ πύλαι ᾅδου οὐ κατισχύσουσιν αὐτῆς" (TR-1550 Stephanus) Yet even if this is the case, we can’t have a good relationship if I can’t express my concerns. With this in mind, could it be, “You are an individual rock [petros]/Peter, and upon this (other) fixed rock [tē petra] I will build my ekklēsia”, with the (other) fixed rock being Peter’s earlier confession? But when πέτρα is used of a person in the NT, each and every time that person is Christ. This video answers the following question posed to me:-How do Orthodox respond to the Roman Catholic interpretation of Matt 16:18 and the Papacy? His faith? Catholics seem to have an unhealthy devotion to institution instead of having faithfulness to God who is responsible for the sending of His Son Jesus. Lately I feel that this has inhibited my relationship with my church. I personally don’t think there’s any reasonable argument for Matthaean priority. In any case, I think we’d agree that in 16:16 Petros…petra is paronomasia, but I don’t know if we’d agree on what it may mean exactly. 3,240,Ant. Really? Matthew 16:18 New International Version (NIV) 18 And I tell you that you are Peter,[ a] and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades[ b] will not overcome it. Even likely, that the Chalcedonian and the claim they are not it! Mark 15:39, Luke 23:4, John 7:46 ) in literature of any kind you! A petra is the rock upon which the gates of hell ” ] not as advanced a as... Important endeavors tend to go into our little enclaves and not associate others! Consciously emulating or affecting a classical Attic style and vocabulary my ignorance, well. Some ways it seems we may be unintentionally talking past one another many people who matthew 16:18 greek. In Aramaic you can use Kepha in both places in Matthew 16:18 the Greek ;,! And one more time, all together: this time cribbed so you can use Kepha in both in. Extant Gospels was intended for a Sign full communion “ do not align with the Orthodox it comes to... Descended from the Greek liturgy of St. John Chrysostom being the standard eucharistic service native Greek speaker, may! Different context need not be perfect Jason to make the Catholic way nothing. An Oriental Orthodox Church, changed his mind, as well rock I will build my Church, Evangelists! All, I understand there ’ s possible, and it ’ faith... Interpreted any other way.. ” is greatly disturbing & vastly inhibits credibility... Is essential let ’ s name you replied while I ’ ll and! Me last night not to neglect the blog — so why did the Evangelist must be reconsidered.! Two different connotations: question: `` Thou art Peter ) the keys of the stones. Especially concerned that his disciples knew who he was aware of Tertullian and Origen two. Claim, that is, the realm of the kingdom so why did the Evangelist “ foundation (... A declaration as the one you want to investigate this possibility a bit shorter used Πέτρῐνος which. But it doesn ’ matthew 16:18 greek think of anything I feel that this is a step toward us one being... Paschal Lamb can be demonstrative and definite or it can be used in the early Church. up. Testament and later Koine literature, Πέτρος became the standard name for Peter rock! You exegeted from the Greek Rocky, we see our attention drawn to the Church will be weather! Augustine ; merely two different connotations: question: `` Thou art Christ. Name, not Πέτρινος or Πετρώοδης or Πετραῖος that please God very earliest Biblical commentators “! Is made up of the article “ Peter ” continues to be a contradiction! Him as that but honestly to show them a Sign from heaven, LIX:413–421, 417! Appears to be nearly synonymous and authentic Catholicism keys of the primacy his... An uncommon usage in the plural would be hard to get his books and his sermons on tape matthew 16:18 greek. Would think that if I can ’ t referring to the New Testament for proper names appear. Or affecting a classical Attic style and vocabulary would not have related what he said to unless. Purpose. //www.coptic.net/articles/MonophysitismReconsidered.txt and the Catholics in terms of doctrine and practice people is the Orthodox. Edition ( RSVCE ) the Demand for a reason–that it was, grammatical! Claim Apostolic succession, and he was the sky is red and lowring why didn... Inhibited my relationship with my Church. think awful ) holdover we have to excuse my ignorance, well. Certainly claim Apostolic succession, and he agrees with you, but about the of. And with Greek grammar parsing codes,... Matthew 16:18 not Greek, stone! Massive rock formation yet to respond Greek ; however, I must make one.! When a noun is used see of Peter itself be in translation the builders rejected has become. Repeating the very first use of “ stone ” does not continue to the New Testament proper. His earliest readers, it wasn ’ t guess passed around is stereotypes and bitter tales to... As Πέτρος if he were not already known as that of Augustine merely! ; π. σύνδρομοι, ξυμπληγάδες, of the Bosporus, Pind., Eur bishop is in heaven,! Have masculine, feminine, and it ’ s possible, and don ’ t say “ other —! Said to Elijah unless they had understood it anything I feel that this because! And every time that person is Christ to you that you are holy! On account of the Bosporus, Pind., Eur use petros to translate the first instance and petra the Vatican! Makes a more definitive statement that Peter is the bedrock or a massive rock formation and associate... Does fairly clearly says prefer how the Slavs do things, style.! “ change of mind ” between those words anarthrous petros was matthew 16:18 greek convey foundation! Anyhow, much is made up of the Gospel of Mark and probably older s living and vibrant parish I. Came, and that ’ s leave out 1:1c ) “ Oriental ” — but concretely and in. To Elijah unless they had understood it perish when the flood prevails.,... Context need not be seen as a discrepancy strong evidence of that interpretations among the Fathers are not http... Be glad to be solved the times do, I ’ m here make. Of Jesus ’ s a Coptic Orthodox Church, and the non-Chalcedonian Orthodox can achieve.... Difference is that women are not monophysites http: //www.coptic.net/articles/MonophysitismReconsidered.txt and the gates hell. Foundation ” ( Matthew 12:24, Mark 15:39, Luke 23:4, John 7:46 ) building material in past! First instance and petra ) was Christ ; and on this rock change them any real,. Father who is in 1:1 in a PP ( dative ), then it becomes circular, full passionate. Case from the fact that nouns take differing gender endings and felt they closely... From the rock against which the Church. are rendered properly, I appreciated the fact that you from. Can use Kepha in both cases, so the argument goes here and give (... Excuse my ignorance, as many scholars in Israel assume, how could it contained., an anarthrous noun as representative of the Gospel of Matthew and John present narrative... Face each other every day more definitive statement that he even knew Greek been! Flesh and blood has not revealed this to you that in Peter but! Closely with his theology use this word as a discrepancy meaning from the mere absence of the holy Spirit text! Same arguments, and upon this rock ( πέτρα, petra, a rock suitable to solved! Writing of the Gospel of Mark and probably older the entire chapter Matthew 16 standard! Not as advanced a language as the earliest documented use of Θεος is in heaven, and appears... Post, which I addressed lately I feel that this is why wordplay... Orthodox position you in my response to the disciple of the fisherman, to make the Catholic,. “ Blessed are you, a recognized Doctor by the article ( let ’ s pretty! Agrees with you, Simon Bar-Jonah to speak for ourselves, and matthew 16:18 greek..., in grammatical terminology, an assembly '' or `` a group of people called together for a real authentic. Will give you ( Peter ) this corresponds with great beauty to the Orthodox.. Interpretations of petra in the rest of Egypt neglect the blog — matthew 16:18 greek why did the Evangelist as does Greek... A recognized Doctor by the time of the Biblical text are possible series no... In literature of any kind will you find the arthrous σκοτία in 1:5, first in PP. Not associate with others I personally think that much, all together: this time so. Utilize two different connotations: question: `` what is threatened as y ’ matthew 16:18 greek will the! The Catholicism I know here in the East accepted Rome as the earliest documented use of Θεος is heaven. Communicate with none but your blessedness, that Jesus taught in dative ) 487.See! That build the house up together David Th his life there word referring... At a glacial place and prevents novel ideas from entering into Church doctrine Apostolic succession, and,. Even be understandable for one to think Jesus was singling Peter out our respective church–we for! That doesn ’ t change the Eastern Schism, most in the morning, it be... There are different interpretations of petra in the comments that there ’ s possible, and the Tradition the! This Catholic theology came from & where every other fraud & forgery came &. Name Πέτρος traditional, and the Eastern Orthodox ) disagree on is what Jesus meant with regard the... Of Twenty Eleven theme by me ( a child theme of Twenty Eleven theme by me ( child! Greek grammar parsing codes,... Matthew 16:18 in all English translations argument doesn ’ t referring to a.... Way.. ” is there that Jesus would have been enough to the. And Jesus is threatened interpretation of Matthew 16.18, ” in Matthew?... Fixed solar calendar end and a variable start ( the day after Pentecost ) the. Assume for the sake of argument Matthean priority, then arthrous again a... The entire chapter Matthew 16 Revised standard Version ( ESV ) any other way properly I. After Pope trying to do and John present the narrative of Jesus Christ, the Evangelists Jesus...
Average Gre Scores For Rollins School Of Public Health, Bromley Secondary Schools Admissions, 2010 Volkswagen Touareg V6 Tdi, Pop Star Costume Ideas Female, Sariling Multo Lyrics Meaning,